Thursday, March 17, 2011

CFL myths exposed

I recently saw a laughably ridiculous anti-CFL video on the Internet the other day.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/75548.html

This is a video clip of Republican Ted Pope of Texas speaking to the US house of representatives.
I am embarrassed that the good people of Texas actually voted this guy into office. Maybe Texas was just having a bad day on election day. 

Mr. Pope begins by saying that "Congress passed an energy bill that should have been called the Anti-American Non-energy bill because it punishes Americans for using energy rather than finding new sources of affordable energy". It goes down hill from there. I listed all his "points" and the actual facts about them below.


Congress is baning incandescent light-bulbs. Actually, this bill only applies to the (energy wasting, expensive to operate) plain old 100 watt incandescent bulbs in 2012, 75 watt bulbs in 2013, and 60 watt ones in 2014. All other types of incandescent bulbs will remain as they were. Halogens, 3-ways, appliance bulbs, candle bulbs, night lights and every other type of incandescent bulb will still be available.

Nowhere in the constitution does it mention light-bulb regulation. Well, duh! The light-bulb was invented years after the constitution was signed by our founding fathers.

CFLs must be disposed of properly. That's a good idea but it isn't a law. It's just common sense. After 5-8 years of use, if you forget to take your old bulbs to your local Home Depot or Ikea for recycling and throw them away instead, they could break and maybe leak mercury into landfill. Not to worry though, since you used a CFL instead of an incandescent bulb all this time, you prevented less electricity from being used and 6 times less mercury from being vented directly into the air by not burning as much coal to make the electricity. Good job.

EPA is making Americans follow clean up rules lest the light-bulb police haul us off to jail? You're an idiot.

CFLs are expensive Wrong again. Over the life of the bulb, each CFL bulb will save the consumer way more in electricity than if they kept using old incandescent bulbs. Also CFLs last up to 8 years so you will save even more money by not buying as many bulbs and not having to change them out as often.

CFLs will fade photographs on the wall. They'll fade an undeveloped photographic negative but a picture? Where does this guy come up with this stuff? I'm assuming he is referring to the potential for UV light to somehow leak out of a bulb. As with every light source, there could be long-term photographic fading. The sun is the biggest offender of photographic fading but Mr. Pope never mentioned anything about banning sunlight.

Congress is forcing all Americans to use CFLs.  CFLs are recommended based on their hands down good economics and energy savings.  But nobody is putting a gun to your head forcing you to buy CFLs.  You the consumer have every right to continue using any of the vast number of incandescent bulbs. Halogens are still going to be around too.  If you don't want CFLs but still want to save money and energy, LED bulbs are also a good alternative. 

CFLs will cause electronic interference. Any device that has electronics (or runs on electricity for that matter) has the potential to cause interference. My incandescent lights also cause interference every time I turn them on or off.  Try it for yourself.  Tune an AM radio to an empty channel. Turn on an incandescent bulb. Did you hear the pop noise over the radio when you turn on the light-switch? 
Any device with a switching power supply also has this potential for interference. Your computer, your alarm clock, cell phone charger, the clock on your oven or your garage door opener.  They all fall under part 15 of the FCC rules just like CFLs.  A properly operating CFL will never posses the ability to interfere with the Super Bowl game on TV, ever!  Especially with a digital television signal. 

CFLs are only made in China. We import every one. Yeah? So? What's your point? Almost every consumer good bought in the US is made in China or elsewhere overseas. Why would you expect CFLs to be any different.

All Chinese products are dangerous. OK, now that just offensive. What kind of type-casting racist are you? 

Congress has no energy plan except to turn on CFL lights. Do you live under a rock? Every year we break the past year's record for the amount of solar power being installed. There is more wind power going in every day. Even off-shore wind power is beginning to find its place just off the US shores. Closed loop hydro-electricity, Nuclear, (sorry Japan, bad timing to bring that one up), Bio fuels. Congress has more types of alternate energy development being put into action now than ever before.

I do have to give Mr. Ted Pope credit for getting his last statement right. “The days of Americans developing new natural energy resources like coal and natural gas are gone”. And with our non-renewable energy resources dwindling fast, it's about time too.

9 comments:

  1. Well, in a way we're being forced to not use regular light bulbs if they are banning them... even at one wattage level a year. No biggie because I mostly use CFLs anyway. One place where I do use the incandescent bulbs is in my porch light. I've tried the CFLs but they don't work well in winter. For some reason mine either won't come on or can't stay on when it's really cold. Do you have another suggestion for me? Are there LEDs that will fit into a standard incandescent light socket?

    Thanks, Leslie Moseley

    ReplyDelete
  2. Halogen bulbs use 25% less energy than a standard incandescent and don't suffer from extreme temperatures issues. They are inexpensive to purchase.
    Bug bulbs are good because they keep the moths away.
    There are some really good LED bulbs coming out on the market (40, 60 and 75 watt equivalent) that will work in cold temperatures when a CFL won't. They are initially more expensive but you will save way more money over the long term in operating costs.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Respectfully, your assessment of fading is not researched well enough. Quite a few reputable sources, including experienced professionals in art and framing shops, post internet notices of increased fading under CFL light. Since you did not research this question, I have my doubts about the entire article. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here is one of many reputable research projects showing more UVB from CFL light than any other source other than direct sunlight. UVB is the primary fading agent of surface material, including photographs, ephemera, paintings and to a lesser extent fabric. ... http://lup.sagepub.com/content/18/6/556.abstract

      Delete
    2. Steve. Thanks for the info. In my article, I stated that all light sources cause long-term fading, not just CFLs. In the link you provided also confirms that, it states that UVA radiation is way higher for incandescent and halogen bulbs and UVB is highest in CFLs.
      None of the bulbs that they tested had any detectable UV radiation from more than 100cm away. It was only when you got really close to the bulb was there any detection of UV radiation. They didn't state what brand or color temperature the CFLs were though.

      Don't discredit my article just because it doesn't have enough sources backing up my findings. It was written as a slightly humorous response comprised of my opinions to the statements of a very silly Texas senator.
      I suggest you read my whole article with an open mind that perhaps CFLs aren't all that bad. They are however just a transition light source that will suffice in 90% of all lighting applications, saving us all a lot of money on our electric bills until LEDs come down in price.

      Delete
  4. You couldn't even get the Congressman's name spelled right...it's Poe NOT POPE! I disagree about your comments re CFLs and art work. They are NOT good around art. Seems to me you need to do better research on all levels.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I must have accidentally put an extra "p" in his name. Thanks for pointing that out to me.
      While CFLs have a small potential to fade art (as with any artificial light), they pail in comparison to the damage that sunlight will do.
      FYI, I no longer maintain this website. For the latest updates check out www.JohnSavesEnergy.com

      Delete
  5. Awesome ! i really found very informative article here and bookmarked this blog. Thank you.solar power

    ReplyDelete
  6. CFL lights is power saving and long life if you are using best quality CFL raw material in the manufacturing of CFL light.

    ReplyDelete